We recently purchased and tested two popular robotic pool cleaners to see how they stack up: the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10. Each robot was assessed on various fronts, including their performance, efficiency, and overall value.
The Aiper Seagull SE, with its sleek design and promise of improved performance, had us intrigued. After putting it through its paces, we found some notable issues that hindered its effectiveness. Though it had a modern look and upgraded battery life, the lack of wall coverage and insufficient cleaning power left us underwhelmed.
In contrast, the Dolphin E10, an entry-level model designed for above-ground and small in-ground pools, showcased reliable cleaning with fewer drawbacks. Though it comes at a more affordable price point, it struggled with automation and offered no wall coverage. Despite these limitations, it delivered a solid overall performance for smaller pools.
After more rigorous testing, including long-term evaluations, we have insights that can help potential pool cleaner buyers make an informed decision. Our reviews encompass various categories such as pool coverage, filtration ability, and feature set and warranty.
The Aiper Seagull SE disappointed with its need for daily recharging and lack of wall coverage, while the Dolphin E10 showed strength in being easy to clean and an effective solution for smaller pools, albeit without advanced automation features.
This led us to critically analyze how we approach testing, ensuring comprehensive evaluations on both reliability and performance aspects. Now, let's delve into how we conduct our tests, ensuring each robot is assessed accurately and thoroughly.
Testing robotic pool cleaners involves rigorous assessments to ensure accurate and reliable reviews. Both the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10 were thoroughly evaluated over a span of three months. During this period, each robot was tested multiple times under various conditions to assess their performance, durability, and user-friendliness.
For the Aiper Seagull SE, our primary focus was on its battery life, ease of use, pool coverage, and filtration ability. The Seagull SE's claim of improved design and battery life was put to the test as we evaluated its ability to retain a charge and operate efficiently over time. Unfortunately, as previously mentioned, the need for daily recharging and limited cleaning coverage were significant drawbacks.
On the other hand, the Dolphin E10 was tested primarily for its cleaning efficiency in above-ground and small in-ground pools. We focused on its ability to clean pool floors thoroughly and effectively. Features such as the filter basket and scrubbing brush were scrutinized for their performance in maintaining clean pool water. The E10 consistently delivered solid results in smaller pools, but its lack of wall climbing and advanced automation features was evident.
Each robot was subjected to different debris types, including leaves, twigs, and smaller particles. This helped us understand their filtration capabilities. The Aiper Seagull SE struggled notably with debris larger than fine particles, while the Dolphin E10 handled various debris types more efficiently.
For assessing pool coverage, we observed each robot across multiple cleaning cycles in different pool environments. This helped us identify any patterns in missed spots or struggling areas. The Seagull SE's random cleaning path and occasional missed spots were disappointing compared to the more systematic approach of the Dolphin E10.
The feature set and warranty of each robot were also evaluated based on ease of use, durability, and overall value. The Aiper Seagull SE's lacking warranty and constant need for charging highlighted its shortcomings, especially when compared to entry-level cleaners like the Dolphin Escape and Dolphin Cayman, which offer better performance and longer warranties.
Another critical aspect of our testing was filtration ability. The Seagull SE's flat filter failed to match the performance of the basket filters found on the Dolphin models. The Dolphin E10's filter basket effectively captured debris, though it lacked the optional NanoFilters available in higher-end models like the Dolphin Quantum and Dolphin Premier.
Our comprehensive testing ensures that every robot is assessed thoroughly, revealing both its strengths and areas for improvement. The insights gathered from these long-term evaluations help us guide potential buyers to make informed decisions, ensuring they choose the best robotic pool cleaner for their needs.
When comparing the pool coverage capabilities of the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10, the differences are quite pronounced. The Aiper Seagull SE focuses solely on floor coverage, which significantly limits its efficiency in maintaining a clean pool. It is designed specifically for flat surfaces without the ability to climb walls or navigate inclines effectively.
On the other hand, the Dolphin E10, even as an entry-level model, offers a more structured cleaning path. It excels in above-ground and small in-ground pools by methodically covering the pool floor. While it may sometimes venture slightly up the walls, it doesn’t offer full wall climbing capabilities. However, its SmartNav 2.0 navigation system ensures it cleans with precision compared to the random path of the Seagull SE.
The cleaning efficiency of both robots also shows notable differences. The Aiper Seagull SE often missed spots due to its lack of a navigation system, resulting in incomplete cleaning cycles. In contrast, the Dolphin E10’s more organized approach ensured thorough cleaning of the pool floor despite its lack of wall coverage.
In actual performance, the Dolphin E10 significantly outperformed the Aiper Seagull SE. The E10's ability to navigate the pool floor and cover more ground ensures a cleaner pool with minimal missed spots. Meanwhile, the Seagull SE often struggled with debris and left areas uncleaned.
From the coverage scores, it's clear which robot stands out. The Aiper Seagull SE earned a 1.5 out of 5 for coverage. It struggled due to its limited capabilities and lack of navigation. In stark contrast, the Dolphin E10 garnered a higher score of 3 out of 5 for its effective floor cleaning pattern. While it lacks wall climbing, its efficiency on the floor sets it apart.
Ultimately, the Dolphin E10’s systematic approach to floor coverage makes it the better choice for those who seek reliable and efficient cleaning for smaller pools. For comprehensive pool cleaning, models like the Dolphin Cayman and Dolphin Premier offer even greater coverage capabilities, including wall and waterline cleaning, to ensure every inch of the pool is spotless.
When comparing the filtration systems of the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10, notable differences quickly emerge. The Aiper Seagull SE utilizes a flat, mesh filter, which falls short in both effectiveness and ease of use. This flat filter fails to capture fine particles efficiently and struggles significantly with larger debris, leaving the pool water less clean than desired.
In contrast, the Dolphin E10 comes equipped with a standard filter basket. While it may not include the advanced NanoFilters found in higher-end models like the Dolphin Quantum, its filter basket does a commendable job capturing a variety of debris types, from fine particles to larger leaves and twigs. This makes it a more versatile cleaner, ensuring that most common debris types are efficiently collected.
The user experience with the E10's filter basket is notably better. It's straightforward to remove, clean, and reinsert, ensuring minimal downtime between cleaning cycles. This ease of maintenance is a significant advantage over the cumbersome process of dealing with the Aiper Seagull SE's flat filter, which often requires disassembling the unit to reach and clean the filter properly.
When it comes to capturing debris, the Dolphin E10 proves to be more effective. Its filter system manages to retain not only the finer particles but also the larger, bulkier debris that often clogs lesser filters. This ensures a cleaner pool, reducing the frequency of manual cleanings significantly.
The Aiper Seagull SE, on the other hand, has difficulties in dealing with any debris larger than fine particles. This limitation often results in the unit missing spots or needing more frequent manual cleanings to maintain water clarity. Its performance in real-world scenarios often fell short of expectations, missing out on large portions of debris compared to the Dolphin E10.
Considering all these aspects of filtration, it’s clear that the Dolphin E10 holds a decisive edge. The Dolphin E10's superior filter basket not only simplifies maintenance but also enhances overall cleaning efficiency. Additionally, the E10's performance in capturing various debris types places it ahead of the Aiper Seagull SE, ensuring your pool remains cleaner with less effort.
From the filtration scores, the Dolphin E10 scored a 3.5/5, showing a significant improvement compared to the Aiper Seagull SE's 2/5. This indicates a clear winner in the filtration category, highlighting the Dolphin E10 as the preferable option for those seeking efficient and effective pool cleaning capabilities.
In summary, the Dolphin E10 stands out as the better choice for filtration, ensuring cleaner pool water with less maintenance hassle. For those seeking a robust and efficient cleaner, opting for models like the Dolphin Escape or the Dolphin Cayman can further enhance the pool cleaning experience.
When we compare the feature sets of the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10, we find that the differences are stark. The Aiper Seagull SE offers a modern design and cordless convenience but falls short in critical areas such as navigation, filtration, and cleaning power. Its main selling point of a quicker charging time and longer battery life doesn't quite compensate for its inefficiencies.
In contrast, the Dolphin E10, while lacking advanced automation and NanoFilters, presents a reliable cleaning solution for smaller pools. Its simple design allows for easy operation, and even though it must be started manually each time, its cleaning capabilities are more robust. The inclusion of a standard filter basket and active scrubbing brush adds to its effectiveness.
The Aiper Seagull SE's lack of a navigation system results in random and often ineffective cleaning paths. This feature's absence restricts its ability to cover the entire pool efficiently. Additionally, problems like basic static brushes and a 1-year warranty exacerbate its performance issues, leading to a feature score of just 3 out of 5.
The Dolphin E10, on the other hand, earns a higher feature score of 6 out of 5. Although it does not have a built-in timer or advanced features, its SmartNav 2.0 navigation system ensures a more organized cleaning pattern, making it a reliable choice for above-ground and smaller in-ground pools.
Another aspect where the Dolphin E10 outshines the Seagull SE is in build quality and filter accessibility. The filter basket on the E10 is easier to remove, clean, and reinsert. In contrast, the flat filter design of the Seagull SE requires disassembling the unit for maintenance, which is cumbersome and inefficient.
From a usability perspective, the Dolphin E10 proves to be more user-friendly, with features geared towards making the pool cleaning process as seamless as possible. While both units cater to entry-level needs, the E10 simply offers a better balance of convenience and functionality.
In conclusion, while the Aiper Seagull SE is lightweight and cordless, its drawbacks in cleaning efficiency, navigation, and maintenance outweigh its benefits. For a more comprehensive cleaning experience, the Dolphin E10 stands out, offering a more organized cleaning pattern and better overall usability.
For those looking for even more advanced features, models like the Dolphin Cayman or Dolphin Premier provide enhanced functionality and better long-term value.Dolphin Sigma gives the best in advanced technology for pool cleaning.
In our comprehensive review of the robotic pool cleaners, the Aiper Seagull SE scored a mere 2.6 out of 10. Its key pitfalls include limited floor-only coverage, a need for constant recharging, and inadequate cleaning power. On the other hand, the Dolphin E10 fared better with a score of 6.3 out of 10. Despite lacking advanced automation and wall climbing capabilities, the E10 provides effective cleaning for smaller pools.
If one must be chosen, the Dolphin E10 wins head-to-head against the Aiper Seagull SE. It offers better filtration, more reliable floor coverage, and is easier to maintain. However, it does lack advanced features like a built-in timer and NanoFilters, elements you would expect from higher-end models.
For those seeking a higher-performing robot with better value, the Dolphin Escape or the Dolphin Cayman are worthy alternatives. Both models provide enhanced pool cleaning capabilities, including wall coverage and better filtration options. For even more advanced features and comprehensive pool care, consider looking into the Dolphin Premier or Dolphin Sigma.
Both the Aiper Seagull SE and the Dolphin E10 cater to entry-level needs but fall short in various areas. The Seagull SE's lack of features and power is particularly limiting. Hence, opting for the Dolphin E10 is a step in the right direction if you are constrained by budget, yet it is highly recommended considering the alternatives to enhance your pool cleaning experience comprehensively.
While the Aiper Seagull SE and Dolphin E10 have their own features, it's worth exploring other highly-rated robotic pool cleaners that might suit your needs better. One standout option is the Aquabot REVA. This robotic pool cleaner has impressive capabilities, including a gyroscope and waterline cleaning. With smartphone app connectivity, you can control and schedule cleanings effortlessly. The REVA is particularly notable for its dual-layer filtration, which allows it to address both fine particles and larger debris effectively.
The Dolphin Escape is another exceptional choice for those seeking a reliable and effective pool cleaner. Known for its powerful motors and efficient cleaning patterns, the Escape is perfect for above-ground and smaller in-ground pools. It comes equipped with advanced features like SmartNav 2.0 and Hypergrip tracks, which allow it to navigate and clean pool floors effectively. Though it doesn't offer waterline cleaning, its overall performance and ease of use make it a strong competitor.
For those who want something a bit more feature-rich, the Dolphin Quantum is a top-tier option. This robotic pool cleaner offers the best of both worlds with its XXL MaxBin and included NanoFilters, which ensure superior filtration and cleanliness. The Quantum's PowerJet 3D mobility and dual scrubbing brushes further enhance its cleaning capabilities, handling everything from fine particles to larger debris with ease. It's ideal for those who require extensive coverage and superior cleaning performance.
These alternatives offer specific features and capabilities that might align better with your pool cleaning requirements. If you’re considering a switch or an upgrade, each of these models comes highly recommended for their robustness and efficiency.
Explore more about these and other top-rated robotic pool cleaners to find the best-suited model for your needs by visiting our best pool robots guide.
