Say goodbye to second-guessing. At PoolPad, we bring you meticulously researched deals on top-rated pool products, handpicked by our editorial experts. No compromises, no mediocre options—just the best of the best, recommended by the most trusted voices in the industry.
What we liked: The cordless design may appeal to those seeking convenience, but that’s where the positives end.
What we didn't liked: With no active brush and weak suction, the Seagull 1000 barely picks up debris and often leaves pools looking unclean. Its inability to handle walls or waterlines, coupled with an ineffective filtration system, makes it one of the least capable models we’ve tested. The short battery life and frequent charging needs further detract from its already limited value.
What we liked: The price might tempt some buyers, but there’s little else to recommend about this model.
What we didn't liked: The Seagull SE is a prime example of cutting costs at the expense of performance. It misses large sections of the pool due to poor navigation and lacks the suction power to pick up finer debris. Its flat mesh filter is outdated and ineffective, and the frequent need for recharging overshadows any convenience provided by its cordless design.
What we liked: The REVA checks all the boxes with waterline cleaning, a gyroscope for superior mobility, app connectivity, and an affordable price, making it a standout in its category.
What we didn't liked: Although the dual-layer filter performs well, the lack of true NanoFilters slightly impacts its ability to handle microscopic debris. It also doesn’t match the extensive filtration options of higher-end models like the Dolphin Premier
What we liked: The Cayman combines robust cleaning coverage, wall climbing, and a weekly timer in an affordable package, making it a standout value in its price range.
What we didn't liked: Its inability to clean the waterline might leave some pool owners wanting more, especially in larger pools.
What we liked: The E10 is an affordable entry-level robotic pool cleaner for above-ground pools that is easy to set up and use, with a solid filter basket capable of handling most debris.
What we didn't liked: Floor-only cleaning and no weekly timer make it inconvenient for users wanting automation. The lack of NanoFilters and wall cleaning feels like a missed opportunity, especially given other Dolphin models outperform it at a similar price.
What we liked: The E30 features complete floor-to-waterline coverage, reliable navigation, and a programmable timer, making it a capable option for most pool owners.
What we didn't liked: Despite the premium price, it lacks multiple filter options, leaving it struggling with larger debris or cloudy water. The short 2-year warranty feels underwhelming compared to competitors like the Dolphin Premier.
What we liked: The Escape delivers strong floor-cleaning performance for above-ground and small inground pools, with features like HyperBrush and MaxBin enhancing its usability.
What we didn't liked: Floor-only coverage limits its utility in more complex pool designs.
What we liked: With dependable floor and wall cleaning and a weekly timer, the Nautilus CC Plus offers basic features that make pool maintenance easier.
What we didn't liked: The lack of NanoFilters and waterline cleaning capabilities limit its effectiveness. At its price, the CC Plus falls short compared to competitors like the Dolphin Quantum, which offers superior filtration and comprehensive cleaning
What we liked: The Nautilus CC offers decent floor and wall cleaning for small pools, and its compact design makes it easy to handle.
What we didn't liked: Stripped of its weekly timer and NanoFilters, the Nautilus CC feels like a step backward. Its inability to clean the waterline and lack of advanced filtration options make it hard to justify its price, especially when better alternatives are available
What we liked: The Proteus DX3 provides solid floor and wall coverage with reliable performance and a weekly timer that adds convenience.
What we didn't liked: The lack of NanoFilters limits its filtration capability, while its inability to clean the waterline leaves a major part of your pool untouched. To make matters worse, hidden restocking fees make returns unnecessarily expensive and frustrating
What we liked: The Premier offers unparalleled filtration flexibility with three filter options, including the exclusive oversized leaf bag. Its waterline cleaning, dual stabilizers, and three-year warranty make it an industry leader.
What we didn't liked: Despite its standout features, the Premier lacks app connectivity, but it can be controlled directly on the power supply - which a lot of users actually prefer.
What we liked: With NanoFilters, an XXL MaxBin, and waterline cleaning, the Quantum stands out as one of the best values in robotic pool cleaners. Its efficient dual motors and advanced mobility ensure comprehensive coverage for all pool surfaces.
What we didn't liked: While versatile, it lacks a leaf bag, which limits its ability to handle pools with heavy foliage, a feature competitors like the Premier include.
What we liked: The Sigma’s commercial-grade motors, gyroscope, NanoFilters, and app connectivity combine to create unmatched cleaning performance. Its three-year warranty and customizable cleaning options make it the most advanced robotic pool cleaner available.
What we didn't liked: The premium price may be a barrier for some buyers, especially since features like Wi-Fi and app control are not always essential for every user
What we liked: The Triton PS delivers excellent floor-to-waterline cleaning, backed by a weekly timer and dependable performance for an average pool.
What we didn't liked: Its filtration options are underwhelming, with only standard mesh filters included. At this price, the shorter two-year warranty is disappointing, especially compared to competing models
What we liked: The X4 offers excellent floor and wall coverage with reliable performance and includes a programmable power supply for scheduling cleanings. Its dual fine filter baskets provide above-average filtration for this price range.
What we didn't liked: Lacking waterline cleaning and ultrafine filtration options, the X4 leaves out features found in similarly priced competitors. The absence of NanoFilters makes it less effective for maintaining crystal-clear water
What we liked: Tracks for wall climbing and waterline cleaning are the only meaningful improvements over other Aiper models.
What we didn't liked: The Scuba S1 is severely limited by its weak suction, inconsistent cleaning performance, and basic filtration system. Its short battery life makes cleaning large or heavily soiled pools a chore, requiring multiple recharges. For the price, there are far better corded options that deliver superior results without constant hassle.
What we liked: The only redeeming quality of the Scuba SE is its lightweight design, which makes handling slightly easie
What we didn't liked: The Scuba SE’s weak suction and ineffective flat mesh filter mean it struggles to clean even the simplest debris. It can only handle flat pool floors, leaving walls and waterlines untouched. Constant recharging for short cleaning cycles makes it impractical, and its overall build quality feels cheap and unreliable.