Today we will compare two popular robotic pool cleaners: the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3. We recently acquired both models, eager to put their claims to the test. Our goal was to see if these budget-friendly options could hold their own against more expensive alternatives.
The Dolphin E10 is marketed as an entry-level cleaner specifically designed for above-ground pools. Although it comes at a lower price point, it lacks some advanced features, such as wall and waterline cleaning. During our testing, we found it to be effective for floor cleanings but noticed it missed several spots, especially around the edges.
On the other hand, we bought the Dolphin Proteus DX3 with high hopes, considering its reputation for powerful suction and programmability. Our tests confirmed the DX3’s strength in floor and wall coverage, albeit with no waterline cleaning. However, we found it troubling that many users reported hidden restocking fees which could significantly increase the cost if you encounter issues with the device.
In terms of reliability, the DX3 stood out with its suction power and consistent cleaning routes. However, the lack of waterline cleaning and the hidden fees were major drawbacks that couldn’t be overlooked. As with the E10, we found that both models required some manual intervention to fully clean the pool.
When conducting our tests, we put the pool robots through a rigorous set of trials spanning over three months. This extensive period allowed us to observe their performance over time and under varying conditions. We focused primarily on three areas: pool coverage, filtration ability, and feature set along with the warranty offered.
The Dolphin E10 was first on our list. Specifically designed for above-ground pools, this budget-friendly option aimed to provide efficient cleaning. Our testing involved setting up the E10 in various pools to see how it handles different sizes and debris. We were keen on its ability to cover the pool floor and its overall navigation efficiency. The Dolphin E10 generally performed well but missed several spots, particularly around the pool edges, which required us to manually clean those areas.
Next, we turned our attention to the Dolphin Proteus DX3. Marketed for inground pools up to 33 ft, the DX3 came with higher expectations due to its advanced features and higher price point. During our testing, we were particularly impressed with its ability to cover both the floor and the walls of the pool efficiently. However, the lack of waterline cleaning was disappointing given its price range.
In addition to pool coverage, we pay close attention to filtration ability. For the Dolphin E10, we noted that it lacked NanoFilters, which limited its ability to handle cloudy water effectively. The filter basket was easy to clean and performed adequately for larger debris, but it could not capture fine particles, which is a significant drawback.
The Dolphin Proteus DX3 fared slightly better on filtration. Although it also lacked NanoFilters, its standard fine filter basket did an excellent job with most debris types commonly found in pools. Nevertheless, for pools that struggle with finer debris and algae, the lack of NanoFilters was a considerable limitation.
The feature set and warranty were critical aspects we evaluated during our three-month testing period. The Dolphin E10’s simple on/off switch was straightforward but became tedious over time. Its lack of a programmable timer meant frequent manual intervention was necessary.
The Dolphin Proteus DX3, on the other hand, offered a programmable timer, which was a significant advantage. This timer allowed us to set cleaning schedules, reducing the need for manual operation. Unfortunately, we discovered that many users reported hidden restocking fees when attempting returns, making the warranty less attractive.
Despite their flaws, both the Dolphin E10 and Dolphin Proteus DX3 showed potential. However, for those looking for more advanced features and reliable performance, we recommend models like the Dolphin Premier, the Dolphin Sigma, and the Dolphin Quantum.
Even though these budget-friendly options have their merits, they may not fully meet the needs of every pool owner. Consider checking out the Dolphin Cayman, Dolphin Escape, or Aquabot REVA for more reliable and feature-rich alternatives.
When comparing the pool coverage capabilities of the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3, there are notable differences. The Dolphin E10 is specifically designed for above-ground pools and can only clean the floor. It uses a 40ft cord, allowing it to cover up to approximately 33ft pools. However, while testing, we observed that it missed several spots, especially around the edges and corners of the pool.
On the other hand, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 is designed for inground pools up to 33ft. It stands out because it can clean both the floor and the walls effectively. Despite this capability, the DX3 does not provide waterline cleaning. This drawback means the crucial scum line will need additional manual scrubbing.
Evaluating both, the Proteus DX3 scores higher in pool coverage with a score of 8, whereas the Dolphin E10 only scores 7 in this category. The ability of the DX3 to clean the walls is a significant advantage. It ensures that less manual intervention is required for maintaining a cleaner pool overall.
However, neither of these models can clean the waterline, which is a critical area for many pool owners. For those looking for waterline cleaning, it's worth considering alternatives such as the Dolphin Premier and Dolphin Sigma. These higher-end models offer superior coverage, including the waterline.
Additionally, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 tends to clean in a more efficient and calculated path, thanks to its advanced navigation system. In comparison, the Dolphin E10's simpler system means it can sometimes miss spots, requiring more frequent manual interventions to ensure thorough cleaning.
Ultimately, for users needing a more comprehensive clean, especially for inground pools, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 is the better option based on pool coverage capabilities. However, the Dolphin Quantum or Dolphin Cayman might also be worth exploring for their additional features and more superior pool coverage.
Choosing between the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3 depends largely on the type of pool and specific needs such as wall cleaning capabilities. For those who prioritize ease of use and more comprehensive pool coverage, the Proteus DX3 emerges as the stronger contender.
When evaluating the filter systems of the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3, significant differences emerge that can impact overall pool cleanliness. The Dolphin E10, as an entry-level model, comes equipped with a basic filter basket. This basket is effective for everyday cleaning tasks, capturing larger debris like leaves and small twigs with ease. However, it lacks the ability to handle finer particles, making it less effective against issues like cloudy water or algae.
By contrast, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 includes a standard fine filter basket that provides a marked improvement in filtration ability. This basket can collect most debris types commonly found in pools, offering a more thorough clean than the E10. However, like the E10, the DX3 does not come with NanoFilters, limiting its effectiveness against very fine particles and algae, issues prevalent in many pools.
Despite both models lacking NanoFilters, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 holds a slight advantage in terms of debris capture. The standard fine filter on the DX3 handles larger debris effectively while doing a slightly better job with fine particles compared to the E10's basic filter. This makes the DX3 a better option for pools facing diverse debris issues.
In terms of filter scores, both the E10 and DX3 scored a 6 for their filtration abilities. However, we found the DX3's filter system to be more reliable and capable of capturing a wider range of debris, making it the preferred choice. The E10's basic filter is suitable for standard debris but falls short when it comes to finer particles.
Comparing the overall performance, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 clearly has the edge over the Dolphin E10 in terms of filter systems. The DX3's enhanced filtration capabilities make it a stronger contender for those in need of a more thorough and versatile cleaning solution. While both models perform adequately for everyday use, the DX3 offers better flexibility and reliability when dealing with various types of debris.
Ultimately, if you're in the market for a robotic pool cleaner that can handle a wider range of debris and provide a more comprehensive clean, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 is the winner in the category of pool coverage. However, considering higher-tier options with NanoFilters, like the Dolphin Quantum or the Dolphin Premier, might be worth exploring for those looking to ensure the best possible pool maintenance.
The Dolphin E10 feature set is straightforward but minimal. It includes a simple on/off switch that gets the job done, but we've found it can become tedious to use. The lack of a programmable timer means you must manually start the cleaner each time, which can quickly become inconvenient.
By contrast, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 offers a significant improvement with its programmable timer. This feature lets you set a schedule for cleaning, reducing the need for manual intervention. However, this convenience is somewhat offset by the hidden restocking fee that many users have reported, which could significantly increase the overall cost if you encounter issues with the unit.
Both models also differ significantly in the design of their user interfaces. The E10's simple design makes it less flexible, while the DX3's interface allows for more advanced control over cleaning schedules. However, the Proteus DX3's handle design can be awkward, making it less ergonomic to carry and maneuver compared to other models like the Dolphin Cayman or Dolphin Quantum.
When it comes to individual scores, the Dolphin E10 earned a feature score of 6 out of 10. This is largely due to its basic feature set, which lacks more advanced functionalities like a programmable timer. Meanwhile, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 scored a bit lower with a 4 out of 10, mainly because of the hidden restocking fee and ergonomic issues.
The lack of major functionalities, such as NanoFilters and waterline cleaning, is a common drawback for both models. Neither the Dolphin E10 nor the Proteus DX3 excels in providing comprehensive pool cleaning solutions, which makes them more suitable for users with less demanding pool cleaning needs.
Ultimately, if you are looking for a robotic pool cleaner that is easy to use and has advanced features, you may have to consider other models. For example, the Dolphin Quantum or the Dolphin Sigma offer superior features and can handle a wider variety of cleaning tasks, including waterline cleaning and using NanoFilters.
Both the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3 have their strengths and weaknesses, as highlighted in their respective feature scores. The E10's simplicity and reliability are strong points, while the DX3's programmable timer offers added convenience. However, the hidden restocking fees and ergonomics of the DX3 are major drawbacks. For those willing to invest a bit more for enhanced functionalities, models like the Dolphin Premier and Dolphin Cayman are excellent alternatives.
In conclusion, the overall scores for the Dolphin E10 and the Dolphin Proteus DX3 tell a clear story. The Dolphin E10 earned a score of 6.3 out of 10, performing decently as an entry-level above-ground pool cleaner but falling short on features and comprehensive coverage.
On the other hand, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 scored slightly lower at 6 out of 10. While it did well in terms of floor and wall coverage and features a programmable timer, the hidden restocking fees and lack of NanoFilters were significant drawbacks.
Head to head, the Dolphin Proteus DX3 is the winner in terms of pool coverage and feature set, due to its programmable timer and better filtration capabilities. However, it still leaves much to be desired for pool owners who expect more comprehensive performance.
For those seeking more advanced features and cleaner performance, we recommend looking at alternatives such as the Dolphin Quantum, Dolphin Cayman, or the Dolphin Premier. These models offer better filtration options, comprehensive coverage, and more reliability.
In summary, while the Dolphin E10 and Proteus DX3 have their benefits, they are better suited for less demanding cleaning tasks. For a superior cleaning experience, considering higher-end models is the better choice. Check out our in-depth reviews on the best pool robots of the year to find the perfect fit for your pool cleaning needs.
If you're looking for an upgraded experience beyond the Dolphin E10 and Dolphin Proteus DX3, several highly-rated alternatives come to mind. One to consider is the Dolphin Escape. Designed primarily for above-ground pools, the Escape offers substantial performance enhancements. It includes features such as SmartNav 2.0, an active scrubbing HyperBrush, and a large MaxBin for debris collection. It’s a significant step up from basic models in terms of coverage and efficiency.
Another high-performing model is the Dolphin Quantum. This ProLine model is built with a larger XXL MaxBin and NanoFilters, making it incredibly effective against fine particles and cloudy water. The Quantum's PowerJet 3D mobility ensures thorough cleaning from the pool floor to the waterline. This model is ideal for pool owners who need superior filtration and comprehensive coverage.
For those looking for a robust and versatile cleaner, the Aquabot REVA is another excellent choice. With dual scrubbing brushes, built-in gyroscope, and an optional smartphone app, the REVA delivers automated, hands-off cleaning. Its dual layer filtration system effectively captures most debris, making it a versatile option for various pool conditions.
Based on your needs for improved performance, we recommend the Dolphin Escape as the most comparable upgrade for your above-ground pool. It provides substantial enhancements in both coverage and filtration, ensuring a cleaner and more enjoyable pool experience.
